Wednesday, March 28, 2012

My Imaginary Conversation Part II

Part one was about authority. Not a popular way of thinking anymore. Very countercultural. People want to democratically pick their authorities but that is not the way it is in God's kingdom. Our rights fall at the foot of the cross and we then obey Christ and those He appoints.

_____

Catholics have a vastly different vocabulary than Protestants. Words common to us both are understood very differently. Catholicism goes back to the culture and understanding of the first century and is born of Judaism. The way we understand religious words is tied to the past, not todays individualistic, post-enlightement thought.

For example "grace." When I was a Protestant the word wasn't defined as anything other than a good feeling, a type of forgiveness and high-five from God. Catholics see it as the actual power received from heaven to overcome. Grace for a Protestant is more symbolic, for Catholics it is real.

I have found this to be true about so many of Catholic and Protestant differences. Catholics see as real what Protestants see as symbolic-- Peter given the keys to bind and loose; a religious, organized, structured (or visible) church; "take eat this is my body"; "be fruitful and multiply" and on and on.

Catholics do not reject scripture, they just interpret it differently. They see the ways the Father's of the church interpreted scripture in the first few centuries of Christianity more trustworthy than most of those today. We look back to get our answers; Protestants look at today.

We love rituals! We think it is God's love language (after all look at the Old Testament! Look at Jesus at the last supper, His command for baptism and the imagery of prophecies. All very ritualistic.)

We think differently on the very basics. Catholics have throughout the centuries--believed that man must be taught. We must go out and search for wisdom, pursue her and work for her. Wisdom and understanding doesn't flower up within us naturally, it is cultivated by hard work. Protestants tend towards believing that everything should be simple and the Holy Spirit plants in our hearts everything we need to know. (They, of course, also use the Bible.) But their mindset is that we develop spiritually from within and flow out. The individual comes to church to give knowledge and truth to the group, whereas, Catholics go to church to receive knowledge and truth given to the church as a whole.

Protestants see each individual as the final judge of truth, they only trust themselves and their conscience. Catholics teach that the conscience must be cultivated and trained by the church and you can trust God's appointed church to judge truth. It is an individualistic versus community idea. And we see this as firmly rooted in what Christ taught through the Apostles and written in God's Holy Word.

Again.... I am having whole conversations in my head with my family and friends... I doubt they would listen to any of it. So I have them here--or at least make notes of all the conversations I would have if I could.

It took me six years of intensive study (dozens of books, talks--or better said--arguments with priests, listening to online sermons and debates) to "get" Catholicism, so I know I won't be able to do much to open up understanding in a sound bite.

There is a song from a musical with the words, "If they could see you through my eyes, they wouldn't wonder at all. If they could see you through my eyes, I guarantee they would fall.... like I did!" That is how I feel about Catholicism. The doctrines show me a Jesus I never expected. Scary. Powerful. Dominating. Authoritative. Strong enough to carry me when I am weak. Strong enough to heal the sins I fall so easily into. Strong enough to give me supernatural courage to face life and the spiritual battles of each day. Strong enough to make me a saint. Strong enough to make me obey.

And when you encounter that kind of strength, there before you each time you gaze at a crucifix,  you see that He is strong enough to save. Strong enough to have mercy. Strong enough to love.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

An Imaginary Conversation with My Family about Catholicism

My family is Seventh-day Adventist. Seventh-day Adventists teach and many believe that in the last days (which to them is imminent) the Catholic Church will spearhead a movement to force all people to go to church on Sunday--and then hunt down, torture and kill Adventists for keeping the Jewish Saturday Sabbath. They believe the Catholic hierarchy is the antichrist and the Whore of Babylon. So, as you can imagine, they are fearful of me now and believe I have fallen to the dark side.

They will not discuss Catholicism with me, for terror of being deceived and that I will cause them to "wander after the beast" and receive the 666 on their foreheads. They actually believe this with all their hearts. And even the more progressive Adventists in my family who are not sure all the SDA "truths" are actually truth, are skeptical and distant. Which breaks my heart because we were at one time, the SDA version of the Osmonds--we were close, sang together publicly.... we had so much fun. Now there is tension and a whole list of censored topics of conversation--to keep me muzzled.

I know they are terrified of my Catholicism. They are hurt and confused. They know, without a doubt, that Catholicism is a child-abusing, alcoholic, Bible-hiding, truth-oppressing, idolatrous cadre of the devil's tyrants. But they think lots of Catholic people are nice!

So, I have constructed a little world of my own in my head which one of them actually has the courage to ask me something about Catholicism. I practice what I will say for I know I will have one shot of about twenty seconds and then they will interrupt and loose focus. I have to hook them in the first few sentences or the opportunity will be lost--the opportunity to lavish on them the love I have received from the Catholic Church and its doctrines. The peace I have received. The courage I have received. The grace I have received.

I guess that I don't have enough faith. If Christ wants to give them the super grace to listen, He can do it and that is what I pray for. I don't want to convert them, just help them give up their fears of Catholicism--to quit seeing us as the "bad" guys. My heart is for Christian unity with them.

Where do you start when up against such misinformation?

In my fantasy world, I would have time to go back to the beginning and show them how everything in the Old Testament was building towards the Messiah. From Genesis onward, the world was being prepared for the mystery of the Incarnation and God with Us. Israel and the Patriarchs were given little pieces, the Moses and the Jewish law--all pointed towards the fulfillment of all--to Christ. God told David that his kingdom would be forever and through his genetic line the Messiah would come.

When Jesus did come, He was constantly being referred to as Son of David, thus fulfilling that promise that David's kingdom would have no end. Jesus established the Kingdom of David and of Heaven here on earth. It came as a seed that would one day become a great tree that encompassed the whole world.

Catholics believe that it was a visible kingdom; a kingdom with God-appointed, God-anointed leaders. The Kingdom of Heaven was there to deal with problems (as Christ commanded that the church be the final say in disputes, Matt. 18: 15-18) it was to be the salt and light shining to the world. He placed Peter in charge, giving him tremendous power--Matt. 16: 18-- just as He put Moses in charge of the Old Testament. The New Testament is establishing an organized religion with leaders: pastors, elders, deacons, etc....

I know organized religion isn't popular--but the Bible clearly sets one up and tells us to be obedient. (Heb. 13; 17; John 15: 20; Acts 16: 4; I Peter 2: 13; Rom. 13:1, 5; 2 Thess. 3:14; James 3: 3; Rev. 3: 3). Over and over the Bible is full of themes of our expected obedience to God's chosen leaders. Children are to obey parents, wives are to obey husbands, slaves to obey masters, and we are all to obey civil law as well as religious leaders. Our culture teaches that God's "rights" are what we should focus on and fight for. However, we never have the right to disobey God's chosen leaders.

What about rotten, stinkin', mean, ornery, blaspheming leaders, are we still to obey them?

Do children still have to obey parents, even if the parent is wrong? (or is perceived to be wrong in a child's eyes?) Do we still have to obey civil authority even when we disagree with Obamacare or traffic lights or government-sponsored wars? Yes, if we have no other choice....

Look for a moment at Israel. It's religious leaders were hardly good; Jesus repeatedly called them a brood of vipers and hypocrites. Yet Jesus said in Matthew 23 that because they sit on Moses seat, "you must obey them and do everything they tell you." And Jesus KNEW that His appointed leaders were placing additional laws on them that He had not given them permission to do. Look at verse four, "They tie up heavy loads and put them on men's shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to lift a finger to move them."

Christ was aware that life isn't fair, at least this life on earth. But we still must obey even the worst of leaders if they are true God-appointed shepherds. Look at the rotten Samson, Saul, David, and the list of ungodly Israel and Judah's leaders in the Old Testament. Some of them made babies to pass through the fires in idolatry to Molech. God's leaders often go astray. Even Jesus disciples were cowardly and one was a thief. On earth, God's kingdom is not governed by the perfect.

I Peter 2: 18-21, "Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh. For it is commendable if a man bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because he is conscious of God. But how is it to your credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God. To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you,leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps."


Well, I would have lost my family long ago.... but this is how I would begin. I would need hundreds of hours to explain how Catholics think and how their religious worldview is vastly different from Protestants....

I would tell them about the most brilliant theological minds of all times being Catholic: Sts. Alexander, Anthony of the desert, Ambrose, Anselm, Augustine, Athanasius, Aquinas.. and those are just the A's! I would talk about the juxtaposition of the mystery and reason I find there, the beauty of the rituals that bring me always humbly to the foot of the cross, the strength and weakness, the unity...

The doctrines are why I am Catholic. But the more I study and believe their Biblically supported doctrines, passed down through the centuries which were given to the church by the Apostles,--I find that I see more and more Catholics who are quietly devoted to the Lord. I overlooked them before because they were not demanding my attention. They were invisibly serving the Lord and making visible things happen without need of recognition.  And how exciting, wonderfully biblical, challenging and grace filled it all is. More than anything else, Catholicism is Christ--the all in all.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

The Greater Glory Trailer

I think with the HHS Mandate and religious freedom in America becoming such topics of interest to Catholics that this movie seems very apropos.



Saturday, March 17, 2012

Actor Jim Caviezel's Role in "The Passion"


This is over a year old, but I thought it so wonderful that I had to post it. 

Actor James Caviezel says, if it weren’t for Medjugorje, he would have never played Christ in “The Passion”



http://www.medjugorjemiracles.com/2010/08/actor-james-caviezel-says-if-it-wasnt-for-medjugorje-he-would-have-never-played-christ-in-the-passion/#.T2Rr2SHOwKE.facebook



In February, 2010, James Caviezel made his sixth pilgrimage to Medjugorje, and afterwards travelled to Vienna where he gave an interview to Christian Stelzer for the magazine Oase des Friedens. The following is taken from the Croatian translation, published in the latest edition of the Medjugorje parish magazine,Glasnik mira.
• Jim, can you tell us, how did you hear about Medjugorje?
My wife came to Medjugorje while I was in Ireland, shooting the movie “Monte Cristo.” Things were not that great, although I worked seven days a week. One day she called me, and I could notice in her voice that there was a change. She started talking about Medjugorje, and how one of visionaries was about to come to Ireland. I interrupted her by saying: “Listen, I really have some serious stuff to do. I am not able now to go into anything with any of the visionaries.” Besides that, I thought that, as a Catholic, I didn’t have to necessarily accept Lourdes or Fatima or Medjugorje. That is how I thought. I remember that in the Catholic school I attended earlier in my life, when we heard about Medjugorje we were thrilled, but we soon found out that the local bishop was objecting and considered the apparitions to be false, and so we lost our interest immediately.
The visionary Ivan Dragicevic came to Ireland, and I knew straightaway that I would not have time for him, since I had to work all the time. One day my movie partner Jim Harris wasn’t feeling well, so I got the day off, and I was able to attend an apparition. I stood at the very back of the packed church, and I wasn’t quite sure about what was going on. But when the man next to me in his wheelchair fell down on his knees at the time of the apparition, I was deeply moved. I thought, This handicapped man, despite all of his pains, is kneeling down on the cold stone floor, and he is praying! Today I realize only God could have known me so well. He knew where exactly He needed to touch me to get my attention!
Although it might sound strange, on the following Sunday, I got another day off, and I was able to meet with Ivan, which was my wife’s special wish. During the time of apparition, I knelt close to him, and I said in my heart, “Okay, here I am. I am ready. Do with me what you want.” In the same moment, I felt as something was fulfilling me. It was very simple, and yet unique. When I got up, tears were running down my cheeks, and I started to cry with all of my heart.
Ivan told me, “Jim. Man always finds time for what he loves. If somebody who doesn’t have any time finds a girlfriend and falls in love with her, he will always find time for her. People don’t have time for God, because they do not love Him.” And he continued, “God is inviting you to pray with the heart.”
I asked him: “How am I supposed to do that?”
“By starting to pray,” he replied. In that moment the doors of my heart were opened. I couldn’t have even dreamed of that being possible. We went to a restaurant, and I must admit that the wine and food I had was never as tasteful as on that particular night.
Something started to change within me. My wife wanted to teach me on many occasions in the past how to pray the rosary, but I always refused to learn. Now I wanted to pray, but I did not know exactly how to do that. I just felt that my heart was opened. One morning, as I was driving to work, I said to the driver who was taking me for filming every day, “I don’t know how you feel about this, but I would want to start to pray the rosary.” To my amazement, he just replied, “Okay, let’s pray.”
In the warm light of love that I felt within me, I was able to realize where I really was, how many temptations I had, what my feelings were, how weak I was, and how strictly I judged other people.
• When did you come to Medjugorje for the first time?
After filming was completed, and that was in Malta, I decided to come to Medjugorje. When I was 20, an inner voice would say to me that I should become an actor. When I spoke about that with my father, he used to say, “If God wants something of you it is for you to become a priest. Why would He want you to become an actor?” I did not understand either at that time.
Again, I asked myself the same question, Does God want me to become an actor to make lots of money and to become rich? I was aware of the imbalance in the world between those who have a lot and those who barely have enough for survival, and I knew that was not what God wanted. And was I to make a choice to seek wealth, which does not provide permanent happiness, or to serve God, Who wants to guide my life?
At that time, Medjugorje reminded me of Bethlehem, and I thought, Just as Jesus was born in a small place, in the same way, the Mother of God is appearing in a poor village in between hills. Those four days I spent in Medjugorje, at that time, were my turning point. In the very beginning, I was still amazed at how much people prayed in Medjugorje. Everything reminded me of basketball camp. There you do not play just one match a day, but continually. The same as in school, where you do not read just once a day, but always, repeatedly. In those first days in Medjugorje, I felt inner unrest while I was praying, because I was not used to praying that much, and I was asking God to help me. After four days the only thing I wanted to do was to pray. Whenever I prayed, I felt connected with God. That was an experience I would wish for every Catholic! Maybe as a child, I felt something similar, and I forgot about it. Now it was given to me again.
The same experience continued back at home. In our family, we live the sacraments together. As we drive the kids to school, we pray the rosary together. Sometimes when I don’t start to pray, my son starts first.
When I came to Medjugorje for the second time, I expected to have those first, initial experiences again, but it was different. After lunch one day, some pilgrims invited me to go with them to visit Fr. Jozo Zovko in Siroki Brijeg. That was also my wife’s desire. I didn’t know Fr. Jozo personally, but I was very much impressed by all stories I heard about him. I met with him. He laid his hands on my shoulders. I laid mine on his shoulders. He laid his hands on my head. I laid mine on his head. In that moment, I felt the words within me: “I love you, my brother. This man loves God.” Fr. Jozo spontaneously turned towards his interpreter and asked her who I was and said that he wanted to talk to me. That was beginning of a lasting friendship.
That was the time immediately after we finished shooting the “Passion,” and around that time, I was able to experience all conflicting forces within me regarding that movie.
• Can you tell us why you felt that way, and what was the connection between that movie and Medjugorje?
You are probably familiar with expression “to cross the Rubicon.” That means it is not possible to go back. You reach the point of no return. The “Passion” was such a Rubicon for me. When shooting started, I was 33 years old, just like Jesus. I always wondered if I was even worthy to play Jesus. Ivan Dragicevic encouraged me and said that God does not always necessarily choose the best, which is something he sees in his own situation. If it wasn’t for Medjugorje, I wouldn’t have ever agreed to take that part, because it was in Medjugorje that my heart opened to prayer and to the sacraments. If I wanted to play Jesus, I knew I needed to be very close to Him. Every day I went to Confession, and I attended Eucharistic Adoration. Mel Gibson was coming to Holy Mass, as well, with the condition that Holy Mass was in Latin. That was good because in that way I learned Latin.
There were always new temptations from which I needed to defend myself, and in those inner battles, I used to feel great inner peace – for instance, in the scene where the Mother of God approaches me, and I say to her: “Look, I make everything anew.” We repeated that scene four times, and I felt every time that I was standing too much in the forefront. Then somebody hit the cross, and my left shoulder was dislocated. Due to that sudden and sharp, intense pain, I lost balance, and I fell under the weight of the cross. I hit the dusty ground with my face, and blood gushed forth suddenly from my nose and mouth. I repeated the words Jesus said to His mother: “Look, I make everything anew.” My shoulder was in incredible pain when I took the cross again and felt how precious it was. At that point, I stopped acting, and you could only see Jesus. He came forward as to the answer to my prayer: “I want people to see you, Jesus, not me!”
Thanks to continuous prayer of the rosary – I can’t begin to tell how many rosaries I said during the time of shooting – I was able to experience a special grace. I knew I wasn’t supposed to use bad language. I knew I couldn’t be rude if I wanted to say something to members of the crew. Most of them did not know about Medjugorje. They were all great actors, and we were lucky to get them. But how was I to bring Medjugorje to them, if not by my own life? Medjugorje, for me, means to live the sacraments and be in unity with the Church. Thanks to Medjugorje, I started to believe that Jesus was really present in the Eucharist and that He forgives my sins. Through Medjugorje, I experienced how the rosary is a powerful prayer and what a gift we have when we attend Holy Mass every day.
How could I help other people to increase their faith in Jesus? I realized that this can only happen if Jesus is present in me through the Eucharist, and so people would see Jesus through my life. When we were shooting the scene of the Last Supper, I had an inner pocket made in my clothes where I placed some relics of saints and a relic of Christ’s Cross. I had a strong desire for Jesus to be really present, and so I asked the priest to expose the Blessed Sacrament. At first, he did not want to do that, but I was persistent in asking, because I was positive that people would recognize Christ more, if I myself was looking at Him. The priest was standing with the Blessed Sacrament in his hands next to a cameraman, and together with him, he approached me. When people watch the movie and see a shimmer in my eyes, they are not aware that they really see Jesus, a reflection of the consecrated Host, in my eyes. The same was in the scene of the Crucifixion. The priest was there; he held the Blessed Sacrament in his hands, and I prayed all the time.
The biggest challenge in the movie was not, as I originally thought, to memorize all the texts in Latin, Aramaic, or Hebrew, but all the physical efforts I needed to overcome. During the last scene, my shoulder was sprained, and it became dislocated every time somebody hit the cross. While we filmed the scenes of the scourging, I was twice caught by those whips, and I had a 14 cm wound on my back. My lungs were full of fluid, and I had pneumonia. Chronic sleep deprivation should be added to that, since for months, I had to get up at 3:00 in the morning, because make-up would take almost eight hours.
Another special challenge was the cold weather, temperatures hardly above zero, which was especially difficult to endure in the Crucifixion scene. My whole costume was made of one single piece of light fabric. While we were shooting the last scene, the clouds were very low and lightning struck the cross to which I was tied. Suddenly everything was silent around me, and I felt my hair standing on edge. About 250 people who were around me saw my whole body being illuminated, and they all saw fire on the left and on the right side of me. Many were shocked at what they saw.
I know that the “Passion” is movie of love, maybe one of the greatest of such movies. Jesus today is subject of many controversies, more than ever before. There are so many factors that threaten this created world, but faith in Jesus is the source of joy. I think God is calling us in a special way in this time, and we need to answer that call with our whole heart and whole body.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

United for Religious Freedom

A Statement of the Administrative Committee of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops:


March 14, 2012

The Administrative Committee of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, gathered for its March 2012 meeting, is strongly unified and intensely focused in its opposition to the various threats to religious freedom in our day. In our role as Bishops, we approach this question prayerfully and as pastors—concerned not only with the protection of the Church's own institutions, but with the care of the souls of the individual faithful, and with the common good.


To address the broader range of religious liberty issues, we look forward to the upcoming publication of "A Statement on Religious Liberty," a document of the Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty. This document reflects on the history of religious liberty in our great Nation; surveys the current range of threats to this foundational principle; and states clearly the resolve of the Bishops to act strongly, in concert with our fellow citizens, in its defense.



One particular religious freedom issue demands our immediate attention: the now-finalized rule of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that would force virtually all private health plans nationwide to provide coverage of sterilization and contraception—including abortifacient drugs—subject to an exemption for "religious employers" that is arbitrarily narrow, and to an unspecified and dubious future "accommodation" for other religious organizations that are denied the exemption.
We begin, first, with thanks to all who have stood firmly with us in our vigorous opposition to this unjust and illegal mandate: to our brother bishops; to our clergy and religious; to our Catholic faithful; to the wonderful array of Catholic groups and institutions that enliven our civil society; to our ecumenical and interfaith allies; to women and men of all religions (or none at all); to legal scholars; and to civic leaders. It is your enthusiastic unity in defense of religious freedom that has made such a dramatic and positive impact in this historic public debate. With your continued help, we will not be divided, and we will continue forward as one.
Second, we wish to clarify what this debate is—and is not—about. This is not about access to contraception, which is ubiquitous and inexpensive, even when it is not provided by the Church's hand and with the Church's funds. This is not about the religious freedom of Catholics only, but also of those who recognize that their cherished beliefs may be next on the block. This is not about the Bishops' somehow "banning contraception," when the U.S. Supreme Court took that issue off the table two generations ago. Indeed, this is not about the Church wanting to force anybody to do anything; it is instead about the federal government forcing the Church—consisting of its faithful and all but a few of its institutions—to act against Church teachings. This isnot a matter of opposition to universal health care, which has been a concern of the Bishops' Conference since 1919, virtually at its founding. This is not a fight we want or asked for, but one forced upon us by government on its own timing. Finally, this is not a Republican or Democratic, a conservative or liberal issue; it is an American issue.
So what is it about?



An unwarranted government definition of religion. The mandate includes an extremely narrow definition of what HHS deems a "religious employer" deserving exemption—employers who, among other things, must hire and serve primarily those of their own faith. We are deeply concerned about this new definition of who we are as people of faith and what constitutes our ministry. The introduction of this unprecedented defining of faith communities and their ministries has precipitated this struggle for religious freedom. Government has no place defining religion and religious ministry. HHS thus creates and enforces a new distinction—alien both to our Catholic tradition and to federal law—between our houses of worship and our great ministries of service to our neighbors, namely, the poor, the homeless, the sick, the students in our schools and universities, and others in need, of any faith community or none. Cf. Deus Caritas Est, Nos. 20-33. We are commanded both to love and to serve the Lord; laws that protect our freedom to comply with one of these commands but not the other are nothing to celebrate. Indeed, they must be rejected, for they create a "second class" of citizenship within our religious community. And if this definition is allowed to stand, it will spread throughout federal law, weakening its healthy tradition of generous respect for religious freedom and diversity. All—not just some—of our religious institutions share equally in the very same God-given, legally-recognized right not "to be forced to act in a manner contrary to [their] own beliefs." Dignitatis Humanae, No. 2.
A mandate to act against our teachings. The exemption is not merely a government foray into internal Church governance, where government has no legal competence or authority—disturbing though that may be. This error in theory has grave consequences in principle and practice. Those deemed by HHS not to be "religious employers" will be forced by government to violate their own teachings within their very own institutions. This is not only an injustice in itself, but it also undermines the effective proclamation of those teachings to the faithful and to the world. For decades, the Bishops have led the fight against such government incursions on conscience, particularly in the area of health care. Far from making us waver in this longstanding commitment, the unprecedented magnitude of this latest threat has only strengthened our resolve to maintain that consistent view.
A violation of personal civil rights. The HHS mandate creates still a third class, those with no conscience protection at all: individuals who, in their daily lives, strive constantly to act in accordance with their faith and moral values. They, too, face a government mandate to aid in providing "services" contrary to those values—whether in their sponsoring of, and payment for, insurance as employers; their payment of insurance premiums as employees; or as insurers themselves—without even the semblance of an exemption. This, too, is unprecedented in federal law, which has long been generous in protecting the rights of individuals not to act against their religious beliefs or moral convictions. We have consistently supported these rights, particularly in the area of protecting the dignity of all human life, and we continue to do so.
Third, we want to indicate our next steps. We will continue our vigorous efforts at education and public advocacy on the principles of religious liberty and their application in this case (and others). We will continue to accept any invitation to dialogue with the Executive Branch to protect the religious freedom that is rightly ours. We will continue to pursue legislation to restore the same level of religious freedom we have enjoyed until just recently. And we will continue to explore our options for relief from the courts, under the U.S. Constitution and other federal laws that protect religious freedom. All of these efforts will proceed concurrently, and in a manner that is mutually reinforcing.
Most importantly of all, we call upon the Catholic faithful, and all people of faith, throughout our country to join us in prayer and penance for our leaders and for the complete protection of our First Freedom—religious liberty—which is not only protected in the laws and customs of our great nation, but rooted in the teachings of our great Tradition. Prayer is the ultimate source of our strength—for without God, we can do nothing; but with God, all things are possible.

Friday, March 9, 2012

Shameless Popery: What if a Bishop (or the Pope) is Morally Wrong?

Shameless Popery: What if a Bishop (or the Pope) is Morally Wrong?: What should faithful Catholics do if their bishop (or worse, the pope) started preaching something contrary to the Catholic faith?  That's t...


The answer to this is, "NO!" Sometimes, Catholicism needs to be short and succinct. We absolutely are morally obligated to follow the historical teachings of the church, not a rogue bishop or pope who is evil. We don't splinter off and start a new church, we remain faithful to the teachings of the Apostles through the historical church.

Labels